|
|
 |
|
|
|
Medal of Honor Airborne Review (continued)
More User Submitted Medal of Honor Airborne Reviews
Date: 2008-02-27
Sub-par and short
This game is fun, but it's gameplay systems are primitive at best. It also has an extremely short single-player campaign. Multi-player is fun for a little while, but it gets old.
Date: 2008-02-21
Great fun on Mac
I play this game on Windows Vista in Bootcamp on a MacBook Pro 2.4GHz, 4GB RAM, and it's great graphics, fluid motion, great sound, and just overall a lot of fun. I'd want to see what even less scripted action would mean and like some other reviewers have said, it's a bit short. But what I find is that when I play it again I try to look around as much as possible and I find lots of new areas to go to. It's a good step forward in the WWII genre and I look forward to the next title.
Date: 2008-02-13
If we fought like this we would have lost the WAR!
Simply said -- DON'T buy it! This game will not load on my three-month old premium PC. It will load on my desktop but runs unacceptably. It is so choppy, slow nor can you aim and shoot with any accuracy. Frequently you see right through the soldier or they are incomplete ghost-like images. Plus, Amazon will not take this game back after 30 days - and it takes longer than that to try to make this ugly thing work.
Call for Duty 4 is vastly superior at least in terms of getting things to work. I don't know how CFD and MOH compare in regards to actual missions and the thrill of the game, since I NEVER was able to PLAY the MOH game.
What is wrong with a company that creates a game either so stupid or with technology so new that the customer had to buy a computer last week to make it work. Aren't they eliminating a huge market? The masses are not going to go out and buy a new PC or expensive video card, etc. just to play a Medal of Honor game - especially when competitor products work fine.
Mike Losey
Date: 2008-01-31
The WWII franchise is over and this is the nail in the coffin!
Hmm, where to begin. The graphics are incredibly awful, the so called drop where you want zones are geared in a way that you literally have only a small area to work with in landing.
So either you land on a building, close to the building or close to the smoke of the drop zone. Oh boy.
The ammo is scarce and the AI borders on mentally handicapped.
Your squad members are as useless as you are left wondering why they are even there other than to yell your name over and over and have you go in and clear all of the enemies out. Ridiculous, why have them? It is supposed to be a team, not one man and a glee club!
The enemy AI is either incredibly accurate and never miss, or they have no business holding weapons.
The recoil on the weapons is ridiculously flawed and the whole game feels like it was built on a good idea and pathetic production.
It is as if they got bored and decided to just throw it out to see if they could get some quick cash.
The only way to check your mission stats is to hit the escape key, it is just a stupid, stupid, stupid game.
The WWII franchise is played to death and overdone and EA is just showing just how pathetically bad they are at anything other than sports.
They screwed up Crysis, they screwed up Stalker, I mean is there anything EA can do right? Oh yeah, NBA or some other football type game...
The game sucks, EA sucks, just horrible and a waste of time.
Not too mention the game is 6 hours for 50 bucks? Is this the level of games now? Is this what these producers and developers are spending all this time making?
Gaming is starting to die in favor of going on-line for stupid multiplayer games that amount to a bunch of teenagers and 12 year olds using big boy words and cheating to have what they call fun.
This game sucks...
Date: 2008-01-18
Nueva saga en MOHA
nos muestra ahora la dicision aerotransportada. con mejores graficos pero por momentos el juego se trona un poco lento. la ultima aprte si es muy buena.
|
|
|
|
