|
|
 |
|
|
|
Rome: Total War Gold Edition Review (continued)
More User Submitted Rome: Total War Gold Edition Reviews
Date: 2007-08-28
Best and most addicting RTS / Empire Building Game I have ever played
I actually purchased Civilization IV about a week ago, because I heard all kinds of hype about how awesome that game is. I was completely disappointed. I got bored of that game very quickly. I felt like I was a city planner or something, not an empire builder....
Then I decided I would give this game a try...wow what a difference. Ironically, this game is very similiar to Civilization IV, but with one HUGE difference, as well as several other improvements. I would have to say that in a way RTW is the same game as Civilization IV, but the FUN version, MUCH MORE FUN.
The HUGE difference I am talking about specifically is the EPIC HUGE BATTLES that you have in RTW. By comparison ---in Civ 4 --- the combat system is basically like moving chess pieces on a board, and the computer tells you if you won the battle. Interestingly, in RTW you also move "chess pieces" around on a board, but lookout --- as soon as you move your army chess piece onto a square with another army ---you go to battle mode: and this is the best part of RTW. Playing the RTW prologue (which is basically the tutorial campaign) I was really impressed with the large battles with over 200-300 units on each side. I had no idea though that this was just a scaled down version of the main campaign where you typically have armies of 1000-2000 units. Yes that is right, when you battle the more powerful enemies you will have battles with 1000-2000 on each side for a total of possibly up to 4000 units (but this could actually be much higher if you have a couple of large armies reinforce each other). Now the largest battle I have had yet has been about 1200 vs 1500, but that is because I have my armies spread out over a dozen different cities / areas. In total, I probably control about 15,000+ military units right now, and my empire is still in it's early stages. I don't even have the game settings for the largest possible amount of units, yes you can change this option in the options menu if your pc is powerful enough to handle the EXTRA large battles.
To make things even more fun --- you also can siege a city or be sieged --- complete with fortified walls, siege weapons, onagers, scorpions, ballistas, archers shooting through the port holes in the walls, having ladders that your infantry climb up to battle on the ramparts --- just think of Lord of the Rings where they have the battle at the keep, you know when Aragorn, the erm horse guys, and the elves are outnumbered and they have to defend until Gandalf arrives...the battles are kind of like that, but ok, the graphics / special effects aren't as fantastic :) Now yes the graphics are fairly basic --- but given the choice between best graphics and small battles and simple graphics and HUGE HUGE battles, I think most people would agree the later is more fun. I mean come on, we have all played the RTS games of the past where you thought you were a bad mofo with 300 units...well now just imagine 3000 units.
the other thing that I like about RTW vs Civ4 is the city management is much more user-friendly and understandable, and yet still complex enough that you have to pay close attention to it because it can literally win or lose the game for you. So this game is not just pump out as many units as you can and destroy everything in your path---but you also have to be careful about managing your cities right or you could go broke. I actually failed the prologue campaign (which in itself is quite long) because I didn't manage my economy well enough and I eventually went bankrupt and couldn't afford to replenish my armies.
My current game is going pretty well though I have been the dominant faction for most of the game and I just recently invaded and took 3 egyptian cities! FUN!
The only bad thing I could say about RTW is that it is very addicting....I haven't been able to stop playing it since I started....
I haven't even installed the expansion yet....
and there are several expansions for this title....
and there are several mods....
I haven't tried multiplayer yet, but I don't feel any need, the single player so far is very entertaining.
Date: 2007-08-28
Rome Total War
the game is joy to play. the only improvement I guess , would be following real Roman history closer
Date: 2007-08-09
A Classic...a bit dated by now
It's a classic turn-based strategy game. The battles are well done, and the game play speed is quite good. Given the game is several years old, the graphics are a bit dated, but it still a fun game to play.
Date: 2007-07-28
Vista compatible? Please help!
I would love to purchase this game but I'm not sure if this will work with Windows Vista? Can somebody please let me know, and if it's not compatible, can you please tell me how can I make it work? I'm a beginner when it comes to PC games so if you can please explain as simple as possible. Much appreciated.
Date: 2007-07-18
Incredible...
I know this game is about two years old now but I just bought it for my brother so I figured I would write a review.
I don't normally write reviews but ROTR is so exceptional that I had to say something. After all with all the crappy games out there it's important to recognize and support games that are exceptional.
With the exception of Starflight (A very old title for you veterans) Bard's Tale (same) and Master of Orion II, this is the best game I have ever played. The combo of turn based strategy and RTS in the battle sequences is so good it will make you cry. If you like deep complex turn based strategy games you *MUST* have this game.
Mideival Total War II is just as good by the way.
|
|
|
|
