|
The Legend of Zelda: Oracle of Ages Review (continued)
More User Submitted The Legend of Zelda: Oracle of Ages Reviews
Date: 2002-03-04
Really, really good!
I really like this game. It's cool and it has pretty good graphics (for a game boy color, that is) and the story is super as well as the game play. There is one bad thing about it, but its small. The puzzles in the game might have you go crying to your strategy guides, even if you swore that you'd beat the game without it. If you're looking for a challenging game with mixtures of puzzles and action, look no further!
Date: 2002-03-04
Seriously Awesome!!!
Just as my title says, it's Seriously Awesome!!! I just love this game! It's full of everything that you could ever imagine. The game is: challenging, adeventurous, and, of course, fun! Although defeating the bosses may be difficult, it's a great game. I just LOVE THIS GAME!!!
Date: 2002-02-27
Another Wounderful Addiction!
I CAN'T put the darn thing down! I just can't! There's so much to do, and so much to be done--all in the palm of your hand! This game is like going into another world. It has everything. Tons of levels, tons of eneimies, tons of friends, tons of puzzels, tons of fun. For HOURS! The folks at Nintendo are geniuses!If time is of essense to you STAY AWAY FROM THIS GAME! You won't get anyhing done! But, it you want an adventure BUY IT NOW! Long live Zelda!
Date: 2002-01-12
Excellent!
This game is a masterpiece of puzzles, but once or twice I was forced to consult a walkthrough, the bosses are difficult, the gameplay is excellent, and the two seperate ages are remarkable. Superior to Oracle of Seasons in my belief, but only because I enjoy the puzzles more than the action, Seasons has alot of action and Ages has alot of puzzles. Pick them both up, I haven't finished Seasons yet but I'm playing a linked game and can't wait to find out what happens in the end.
Date: 2001-12-30
Not as good as expected
I started my Zelda collection during the Oracle series, and own both Ages and Seasons. I have beaten Seasons, and have not even beaten Ages, but can already tell that it is not as good. The gameplay is not as good as in Seasons, hinting to me that Ages was released first, tested, and Seasons was refined accordingly. One thing I noticed right away in the game is that compared to Seasons, many of the people you talk to are very rude. It almost made me not want to talk to any of the people, but of course, you can't beat it that way. Many of the people in Seasons, on the other hand, were pleasant to talk to and gave you useful information. I also thought that only providing two ages limited the perspective of the game, as seasons lets you experience the landscape in four seasons, making the gameplay more interesting. I would suggest buying both games if you can afford it, but my suggestion is to play Seasons first if you want to start out with the better one, and Ages if you want to start out with the lesser one.
|
|
